After a set of serious and dramatic films, culminating in the very dark The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Disney took a step back into light-hearted comedy with Hercules, one of their zaniest and wackiest films. Though Hercules is mostly entertaining, it borrows perhaps a little too freely from other sources, while failing to properly borrow from what should be its most important source of all – the original legend of Heracles, or, Hercules and the Greek, or Roman, mythology that surrounds it.
It’s a Renaissance movie, do I really have to say how
good the animation is? As usual, it’s smooth, expressive, detailed, it’s all
good stuff and adds a lot to the great action scenes, though some of the
computer animation, particularly that of the Hydra, is a little dated. The art
style is more angular and stylised, without going as far as films animated in
the xerographic process, such as One
Hundred and One Dalmatians; it’s more similar to what Disney tried with Sleeping Beauty but, in my opinion, they
are more successful here, making for some very interesting character designs. The
colours are nice and clean, of particularly note is the way in which the Gods
shine with this kind of neon glow, it looks great and creates a really cool
effect. This neon look, combined with the art style, kind of gives the film a look of
the Ancient World not as it really was, but more like how it is portrayed in Las
Vegas, like Caesar’s Palace; this is a very interesting and original idea that
gives the film a unique and heavily stylised look which perfectly suits its
sense of humour. The backgrounds are mostly just okay, there are a couple of
standouts such as the top of Mount Olympus, which looks great, but mostly they
aren’t that noticeable. Overall, Hercules’
art and animation isn’t quite as grandiose or artistic as The Hunchback of Notre Dame or The
Lion King; the little touches just aren’t as developed, the lighting, the
shading, the framing, it’s a lot more simplistic, but there’s nothing wrong
with that and it fits the more light-hearted tone of the movie well.
Hang on I thought we were watching the Hercules movie not playing the PS1 game- oh wait...
The story is... messy, at best; there are a lot of issues
that hold the film’s narrative back and just leave you scratching your head and
wondering why Disney ever made such strange choices. At the centre of these
problems is the fact that Hercules is ostensibly based on Greek mythology and
yet takes so little from it that it becomes difficult to understand why Disney
even bothered calling the film Hercules at
all. Practically nothing whatsoever is depicted with any accuracy – Zeus and
Hera being happily married, good parents, Hades being this over-the-top bad
guy, the Titans being these mindless beasts, even little things like making
Narcissus an Olympian God when he was just an ordinary guy, all for the sake of one bad joke. While Disney always
messes with the stories it adapts to make them fit their formula and keep them
family friendly, this one really takes the cake; the original novel for The Hunchback of Notre Dame, for
example, is obviously quite different to the Disney film, containing much more pessimistic aspects, adult themes and a tragic ending, but Disney still made their version
dark and serious, while still suiting their family friendly style. Hercules however, ignores the original
source material so spectacularly that it comes off as a parody of bad Disney
adaptations; really, it feels more like an adaptation of Superman than it does
the stories of Hercules – a young baby is found by a couple who live on a farm,
who have been praying for a child but could never have one. The baby is
revealed to have superhuman strength and grows up feeling like an outsider and
looking for a place to belong; when he reaches adolescence, the boy is told the
truth and so goes on a journey to find who he is. He manages to make contact
with his father, who comes from another world and tells him who he truly is;
the boy then trains to control his powers, travels to the big city where he
meets a feisty young woman and becomes the world’s greatest hero who
consistently defends the city from- do you see where I’m going with this? It’s
just a very strange choice, why choose to make a film about Greek mythology if
you’re just going to make a film about comic book mythology?
The weirdest thing about this is that the whole point about
Greek mythology is that it is open to interpretation, there is no one source material
to stay true to, so you can pick and choose what stories you want to tell and
then interpret them in new and different ways – this is one of the only times
where Disney had a lot of freedom and room in which to mould a story to suit
their needs. It’s strange then that for one of the only stories Disney adapted
where they had a lot of lee-way, they don’t take advantage of this, as they
take such little inspiration from any aspects of Greek mythology that it really
has nothing to do with it, it almost seems like a bad joke. At the end of the
day, I understand this is probably just a personal issue, as I’m pretty into
Greek mythology, so I see the flaws and strange choices more than others;
still, objectively, this just feels like a really big missed opportunity, as
Disney seems more focused on making The
Flintstones-esque jokes about the Ancient World than it does with engaging
with the source material, perhaps most blatant in the fact that the Gods, who
are always the most fun and interesting parts of Greek myths, barely appear in
the film. It just feels like they made all the worst choices they could’ve
possibly made.
Close but no... ethereal, ancient Greek deity-conjured cigar
The movie also struggles with issues that are present in the
original Greek myths as well, in terms of the Gods’ powers and the extent of
their ability to interfere with mortal lives. The original stories would suggest several different excuses for this problem and go back and forth as to which
was true – sometimes the Gods couldn’t interfere because of fate, sometimes
they could change fate but just weren’t supposed to, sometimes the Gods had the
power to interfere but Zeus wouldn’t let them, sometimes they did interfere but
then apparently couldn’t later on – it never really made much sense, but this
is because all these different stories were told by different people, so
obviously there is not one solid continuity throughout them. This excuse doesn’t
really work with Hercules however,
which, as a single ninety minute film, should be internally consistent and make
sense within itself; however, the writers just seem a little too lazy to really
address any of these issues, as well as some
basic concepts of storytelling, ending up with a lot of things that just
don’t make sense. Why can’t Hercules go back to Olympus? ‘Only Gods can live on
Olympus’ seems like a pretty flimsy reason to me and even if so, I don’t
understand why Zeus, King of the Gods, can’t just make Hercules a God again.
How come Zeus never comes to Hercules until he’s a teenager? How come he never
helps him? How come Zeus defeats the Titans single-handedly in the opening, but
in the climax, the combined force of him and every God on Olympus can’t beat them
without Hercules’ help? Is Zeus just getting too old for this stuff? How come in
eighteen years, Hades never discovers that Hercules isn’t dead, even though he’d
surely have double-checked and all the other Gods knew? It’s explicitly stated
that Hera and Zeus were watching over him, so what, did they just never talk to
Hades once in eighteen years? Did he not even come up to offer his fake
condolences only to hear that Hercules wasn’t really dead? And when Hades takes
Hercules’ strength away, why doesn’t he just kill him there and then instead of
sending the Cyclops? It seems like it would be a lot easier to just slit the
helpless Hercules’ throat, or for an all powerful God to just burn him to a
crisp, rather than give Hercules the time to escape or formulate a plan. A lot
of the story just does not make sense; even for a kid’s movie this is very flimsy.
The movie is jam-packed with stuff, there’s always something
going on; while in some respects, this is a good thing and there’s certainly
not a wasted minute, I’ll give it that, things just move so fast that it’s
kind of hard to build up a satisfying story. We’ve only known Hercules for
about ten minutes before he starts talking about how he tries so hard to fit in
and doesn’t belong and yada yada, yet we haven’t seen much evidence of that; we
see him screw up one time, but that’s not really enough to justify what he’s
saying, it’s not that I don’t believe it’s true, but I just haven’t seen enough
to really emotionally identify with Hercules’ problem. Compare this to the
opening of Beauty and the Beast,
where the song “Belle” perfectly communicates to the audience Belle’s place in
the town, why she is an outsider and what she wants from life, all within the
space of about five minutes; we instantly like Belle, believe in her problems and,
most importantly, understand how and why she feels the way she does and want her to get what she wants. Hercules
never does this, it’s always rushing to the next thing – one minute he’s a
baby, the next he’s a teenager, then suddenly he’s met Zeus, then he’s rushing
off to find Phil, then suddenly he’s an adult, then he’s the biggest hero in
Greece, then he’s in love after one date, it all moves very quickly. While this
frenetic pace does match the film’s irreverent sense of humour, it stops it
from ever really developing a compelling narrative and prevents the audience
from ever becoming emotionally involved in the characters.
Rip on, Rip off
Speaking of its sense of humour, this is perhaps where Hercules is most derivative – it’s
clearly trying very hard to be Aladdin in
Greece: it has the same Ancient World setting, the same zero to hero story and most
importantly, the same comic style, utilising modernistic dialogue and pop
cultural references for jokes. However, while Aladdin knew to keep this to a minimum and mostly only make these
kinds of jokes through the appropriately wacky character of the Genie, Hercules relies on them a little too often,
undermining the style and atmosphere of the film. Gags like Thebes being called
“The Big Olive”, acting as a stand-in for New York City, having huge mosaics instead
of billboards, pots with green and red men painted on them instead of traffic lights
and Pain saying ‘someone call IX-I-I!’ resemble History of the World, Part I or Life
of Brian in the way they use aspects of the Ancient World to poke fun at
modern day life. However, the satire in Hercules is, unsurprisingly, not as
intelligent and, though it does have a bit more bite than most Disney films, it’s
still too soft and family friendly for it to ever really work as the satire it
seems to want to be. The jokes aren’t insultingly bad or anything, they’re just
corny and a bit too prevalent; they never annoyed me, but the only times they
really made me laugh were in pure disbelief at how silly they were.
The characters are hit and miss, some are very bland, some
of full of personality. Hercules himself is a very traditional Disney hero, he’s
nice and noble, but dull as a rock, he really doesn’t have much of a
personality to him at all, so you never really get very involved with his
character or care about what happens to him. Meg is actually a much better
candidate for the main character role, as she not only has a personality, but
actually changes over the course of the film and has to make tough decisions
and sacrifices, unlike Hercules, who seems to have everything come pretty easy
to him after the first twenty minutes or so. Meg is a very likeable and
different love interest, in that initially, she actively resists this role and
is never defined simply as “Hercules’ girlfriend”; her back story is simple,
but effective, giving her a legitimate reason for her behaviour, as well as a
genuine and well executed character arc which is much more interesting than Hercules’
– the way in which she learns to trust and love again is portrayed
realistically, even if her relationship with Hercules isn’t especially well
developed. Meg is a classic femme fatale, charming, seductive, dangerous, witty
and always in control; she’s another enjoyably sassy Renaissance love interest.
Meg in full effect
Zeus is well voiced by Rip Torn and can be quite fun, but is
mostly as dull as his son and doesn’t really do much; we don’t see much of the
others Gods’ personalities, besides Hermes who is just annoying, but when we do
they just come off as boring sycophants who suck up to Zeus. This is a real
waste considering the rich characteristics of the Gods in the original tales
and also bizarre, considering, as I said earlier, their exploits are always the
best part, so it’s surprising how underutilised they are here. Phil is
reasonably fun, he seems to be inspired by characters like Mickey from Rocky, the gruff, streetwise trainer
with a heart of gold, a fun character type Disney hasn’t really done before;
Danny DeVito has a great, distinctive voice and does a good job here, he’s
pretty fun. Hades is a wonderfully enjoyable villain, at times he is
deliciously smug and cocky, at others humorously ill-tempered and vindictive;
his mood just changes at the drop of the hat as he explodes from totally in
control to completely enraged. James Woods gives a fantastic performance; he
puts so much life and energy into it, when Hades is supposed to be angry, he
really does sound furious, when he’s being a sleazy fast-talker, Woods delivers
his lines with effortless speed and aloof disinterest, masterfully transforming
Hades into this kind of supernatural used car salesman or shady loan shark who deals in souls instead of money,
it fits his character perfectly. In fact, Hades is so fun and likeable it’s
almost a problem, as it’s very easy to want to see him triumph over the boring
and self-indulgent Gods of Olympus; he’s always a blast to watch and is one of
the best parts of the movie. Pain and Panic are typical villainous sidekicks,
but they at least mix the formula up a bit by being a double-act, though they
are basically just the Hyenas from The Lion
King, sans Ed. While I have always found Bobcat Goldthwait’s “voice” annoying,
I have to admit it at least works better for animation and Matt Frewer is good as
Panic. They have a couple of funny lines and obviously put effort into their performance,
but at times, Pain and Panic can be a little too obnoxious.
Besides Hades, the best part about the movie is the
soundtrack, which is one of the most consistently good of any Disney movie. Most of the songs are inspired by gospel music, demonstrated through the characters
of the Muses; this ties in to the “Las Vegas version of the Ancient World”
theme, as rather than a traditional Greek Chorus, Hercules has a modern Greek
Gospel Choir to comment on its story, an appropriate and successful idea. “The
Gospel Truth” is the weakest song of the bunch, but is still pretty good; it
has a nice, mellow sound and serves as a good intro to the story. “Go the
Distance” is effectively “The Whole New World Number” and even though it’s a
bit sappy, I quite like it; yeah it’s corny, the lyrics aren’t inventive, it’s
very poppy and doesn’t really fit with the style of the other songs, but there’s
something about it that feels quite powerful and hopeful to me. I don’t know
why, but I like this one. “One Last Hope” is the most classically “Disney” musical number and it’s a great one at that, it’s upbeat, with fun lyrics,
serving as a good introduction to Phil’s character, and an effective montage which
demonstrates the time span and results of Hercules’ training quickly and capably.
“Zero the Hero” is the big show stopper, a great gospel-infused number full of
energy and some charming rhymes – ‘Is he bold? There’s no-one braver. Is he
sweet? Our favourite flavour!’ – Again, it also works as a good montage, it’s
an awesome song. “I Won’t Say I’m in Love” is one of Disney’s better love songs;
rather than being slow and overly-sentimental, it’s upbeat and catchy, as another
gospel inspired number which, rare for a Disney movie, acknowledges the problems
that come with love as well as the positives. Though “A Star is Born” isn’t
really a musical number so much as just as a stand-alone song, it’s so good it
doesn’t really matter; another gospel number, it’s super high-energy, catchy,
triumphant and a perfect end to the movie. Though the numerous musical montages
do mean that a lot of interesting parts of the story are skipped over, the lack
of depth in the narrative can be forgiven for the quality of this fantastic
collection of songs.
Danny DeVito plays a short, hairy, goat-like creature with a New Jersey accent... Not much of a stretch, huh?
Hercules is a fun
movie, though not a very smart one; it lacks originality, drawing inspiration
from a lot of other sources for its attitude and comedic style, though that’s
not necessarily a bad thing. While the dedication to a more satirical style of humour
is admirable, this means that story and characterisation mostly take a
backseat to the jokes, which are often a little too goofy and, though harmless,
not really funny enough to justify the lack of an engaging narrative or poor
use of the source material at hand. While not an especially mature or intelligent
film and not purely entertaining enough to make up for its shortcomings in the
way that Aladdin is, Hercules is still a pretty good time – it’s
nice to look at, the songs are great and the action is fun. It’s a silly movie,
but I like it all the same.
7/10
Next Week: Mulan!
Email: joetalksaboutstuff@gmail.com
Twitter: @JSChilds
7/10
Next Week: Mulan!
Email: joetalksaboutstuff@gmail.com
Twitter: @JSChilds
No comments:
Post a Comment